INDICATORS OF RESEARCHERS’ DIGITAL COMPETENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF WEB-BASED ENCYCLOPEDIC RESOURCE USE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000802

Keywords:

digital competence, researchers, web-based information systems, online encyclopedia, electronic scientific and educational resource, users of the

Abstract

The study addresses the issue of identifying indicators of digital competence (DC) among researchers in the context of using web-based encyclopedic resources (WBER) as elements of digital academic infrastructure. The focus is placed on the role of WBER as a platform of open science, which introduces new requirements for researchers' digital preparedness, particularly about working with ontologically structured data, metadata, semantic web services, and editorial standards of digital environments.

The author's contribution to the problem lies in refining the list of relevant DC indicators for researchers through adapting the DigComp 2.2 framework to the needs of the academic environment. These indicators are classified according to the traditional three-component model: knowledge (of WBER structures and functions, principles of the semantic web, and digital publishing standards), skills (content analysis, source verification, editing, integration of WBER into research activities, and collaborative data work), and attitudes (participation in content development, adherence to systemic coherence, and academic citation practices).

The key methodological approach is the principle of internal consistency, applied to assess the alignment of three models of structuring digital competence with the goals and objectives of the study, namely, the functional-operational, the contextual-integrative, and the structural-competency-based approaches. The latter is the most relevant, as it enables the construction of a system of measurable indicators that can be replicated, adapted to evaluation methodologies, and, if necessary, integrated into training and professional development systems.

The practical foundation of the study is based on the experience of the "Ukrainian Electronic Encyclopedia of Education" platform, particularly the analysis of user activities (authors, editors, and moderators) related to content creation, editing, updating, and categorization

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Reich, J. (2020). Failure to disrupt: Why technology alone can’t transform education. Harvard University Press.

Weller, M. (2020). 25 Years of Ed Tech. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781771993050.01

Marikyan, D.& Papagiannidis, S. (2025) Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A review. In S. Papagiannidis (Ed), TheoryHub Book. Available at https://open.ncl.ac.uk/ ISBN: 9781739604400

Yee, M. L. S., & Abdullah, M. S. (2021). A Review of UTAUT and Extended Model as a Conceptual Framework in Education Research. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol11.sp.1.2021

Marone, V., & Heinsfeld, B. D. (2023). “Everyone pursuing their dreams”: Google’s and Microsoft’s discourse on educational technology. Computers and Education Open, 4, 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100138

Пінчук О. П., Кондратова Л. Г., Литовченко О. В., & Полященко І. М. (2024). Вітчизняний і міжнародний досвід використання веборієнтованих автоматизованих систем інформаційних систем в освітньому процесі. Інноваційна педагогіка, 77, 276-281. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-6085/2024/77.55

Пінчук О. (2025). Оцінювання цифрової компетентності науковців і вчителів у роботі з веборієнтованими енциклопедичними ресурсами. Цифрова компетентність вчителя 2025: формуючи майбутнє освіти : збірник матеріалів / за заг.ред. О.В. Овчарук. 166-169 с. https://doi.org/10.33407/lib.NAES.id/eprint/745886

Пінчук, О. П., Кондратова, Л. Г., & Кохан, О. В. (2024). Веборієнтовані інформаційні системи підтримки поняттєво-термінологічного апарату педагогіки і психології. Науковий часопис Українського державного університету імені Михайла Драгоманова. Серія 5. Педагогічні науки: реалії та перспективи, (102), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.31392/UDU-nc.series5.2024.102.11

European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2, The Digital Competence framework for citizens : with new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/115376

Ouchaouka, L., Laouina, Z., Moussetad, M., Talbi, M., Amrani, N., & Elkouali, M. (2021). The Effectiveness of a Learner-Centered Pedagogical Approach with Flipped Pedagogy and Digital Learning Environment in Higher Education Feedback on a Cell Biology Course. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., 16. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i12.19125.

Zhou, J., & Bhat, S. (2021). Modeling Consistency Using Engagement Patterns in Online Courses. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448161.

De Lis González-Mujico, F. (2023). Measuring student and educator digital competence beyond self-assessment: Developing and validating two rubric-based frameworks. Education and Information Technologies, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12363-7.

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher education, 32(3), 347-364.

Published

20.11.2025

How to Cite

Pinchuk О. П. (2025). INDICATORS OF RESEARCHERS’ DIGITAL COMPETENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF WEB-BASED ENCYCLOPEDIC RESOURCE USE. Journal of Information Technologies in Education (ITE), (58), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.14308/ite000802